Cross-body stretch
Also called cross-body shoulder stretch, horizontal adduction stretch, modified cross-body stretch, prone cross-body stretch
A shoulder stretch that pulls the upper arm across the front of the body. What studies measured in the deltoid, the rotator cuff muscles and the capsule, how range changed, and the doses trials used.
- Region
- Shoulder
- Muscles
- posterior deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor
- Updated
- October 22, 2026
- Reviewed
- October 22, 2026 · how entries are checked
Movement
The stretch brings the upper arm across the front of the body, a movement called horizontal adduction8.
The plain version
In a trial of 39 college-age people without symptoms, the other arm pulled the upper arm across the body9. The scapula (shoulder blade) was not held, and the pull went to mild discomfort9. In a trial in patients with shoulder pain, people lay on the back with the elbow bent8. They pulled to the point of tightness but not pain8.
The trials on this page that name a position used seated, lying on the back, side-lying or face-down versions8,10,11,12.
Holding the shoulder blade
A 2013 clinical commentary recommended modified versions for overhead athletes, athletes whose sport uses repeated overhead arm actions13. For the cross-body stretch, it cited the inability to hold the shoulder blade still and control rotation at the joint13. Trials have held the shoulder blade in four ways:
- by hand, in 60 women volleyball players3;
- with a belt under the armpit, in 26 people with limited horizontal adduction4;
- by a therapist pressing on its outer edge, in patients with shoulder pain8;
- against the table, with outward rotation blocked, in patients with subacromial pain14.
Lying on the side or face down
One trial of male tennis players used a modified version11. People lay on the dominant side with the trunk rolled 20 to 30 degrees back11. The shoulder was raised to 90 degrees, and the other forearm lay on top to block outward rotation11.
A study of college overhead athletes used a prone, or face-down, version12. The shoulder was raised forward 90 degrees and brought across the torso12. The other arm reached overhead, and the authors wrote that lying face down lets body weight give the stretch12.
How participants got on with it
No adverse event (an unwanted effect seen during a trial) was reported in a trial of 24 adolescent baseball players15. None was reported in a trial of 70 patients with subacromial pain syndrome14. In overhead athletes with shoulder pain and a rotation loss, adherence and feelings about the stretch were similar for sleeper and cross-body groups16.
What it loads
The authors of a 2015 study wrote that there was no consensus on which tissues cause the shoulder range losses of baseball players17. Studies of this stretch measured the muscles and capsule behind the shoulder1,18.
The back of the deltoid
The back part of the deltoid draws the arm backward19. Shear wave elastography is an ultrasound method that estimates how stiff a tissue is. With it, a study of 15 healthy men tested 13 positions1. The back part of the deltoid was stretched most with the arm fully across the body and raised forward to 90 degrees1.
In the same men, raising the arm and bringing it across changed how far the muscle stretched1. Turning the arm inward had a limited effect1. In nine cadaver shoulders (bodies donated for study), the cross-body position with the arm raised 60 degrees did not strain the infraspinatus much20. It produced significantly larger strain in the back of the deltoid20.
The rotator cuff muscles behind the shoulder
The infraspinatus and teres minor turn the top of the humerus outward and help carry the arm backward21. Stiffness is how much force it takes to stretch something by a given amount. Studies that measured it in these muscles found different things:
| Who was studied | What was found |
|---|---|
| 20 healthy men, one session | With the shoulder blade held, infraspinatus stiffness fell; without it, none of the three measured muscles changed22 |
| 24 college baseball players with limited inward rotation, four weeks | Teres minor stiffness fell in the modified cross-body group23 |
| 34 male professional volleyball players | Six weeks of sleeper and cross-body stretching had no effect on infraspinatus or back deltoid stiffness24 |
A 2024 narrative review of 37 studies looked at one bout of static stretching25. Infraspinatus stiffness fell in both studies that measured it, while the teres minor and back deltoid showed no significant change25.
The capsule
The joint capsule completely encircles the shoulder joint21. The rotator cuff tendons fuse with its front, top and back walls26. In a crossover study, in which each person tries every option in turn, 15 healthy young men did both the sleeper and cross-body stretches18. The cross-body stretch lowered stiffness in the lower back of the capsule but not the middle part18. In six of the 15, the fall was larger than the method’s measurement error18.
How the body adapts
Many of the trials below enrolled people with less inward rotation on one side and no symptoms3,10,29.
After one session
- In 87 healthy people with over 10 degrees less inward rotation on one side, one session raised range more than a no-stretch control10. The stretch sensation at the end of range fell. The pressure pain threshold, the pressure at which pressing on a spot starts to hurt, rose10. A 3-minute cold pack on the infraspinatus and back of the deltoid gave range gains no different from the stretch10.
- In 60 women volleyball players with a rotation loss and no symptoms, holding the shoulder blade by hand gave larger immediate gains3. Inward rotation reached 51 degrees, against 43 without the hold3.
- In college overhead athletes, with 212 shoulders assessed, both the prone cross-body and sleeper stretches were followed by range gains12. Horizontal adduction improved with the prone cross-body stretch alone12. The examiners were blinded, and the authors declared no competing interests12.
The authors of the 87-person trial noted that all participants were young and that only immediate effects were studied10.
Over weeks
Trials lasting three to six weeks found these results24,29:
| Who was studied | Programme | What was found |
|---|---|---|
| 54 people without symptoms | Cross-body or sleeper stretch, four weeks | Inward rotation rose 20.0 degrees with cross-body, significantly more than controls’ 5.929 |
| 26 people with limited horizontal adduction | Self-stretching four times a week, four weeks | Horizontal adduction was greater with a belt holding the shoulder blade; strength did not differ4 |
| 24 adolescent baseball players | Cross-body alone or with sleeper, three weeks | Both groups improved, with no significant difference15 |
| 30 male tennis players with a rotation loss | Modified cross-body or modified sleeper, 4 weeks | Inward rotation and arm function improved in both, with no significant difference11 |
| 34 male professional volleyball players with tightness behind the shoulder | Sleeper and cross-body, six weeks | Better than controls for inward rotation, spike speed and seated shot-put distance24 |
The 54-person trial’s authors wrote that its small sample likely kept the two stretches from differing significantly29.
What reviews concluded
The sleeper stretch page covers more reviews of the two stretches together30. Two bear on this stretch:
- A 2026 meta-analysis of six trials found 7 more degrees of inward rotation and 6 of horizontal adduction than controls2. Its authors wrote, as the reason for the review, that how well the stretches work remained uncertain2.
- A 2026 review of four studies in throwing athletes concluded that instrument-assisted soft-tissue work may be more effective than passive stretching7.
Studies in people with shoulder pain
Subacromial pain syndrome is shoulder pain around the acromion, the bony point at the top of the shoulder, that did not start with an injury. A randomised trial took 70 patients with it and a rotation loss, all given a 4-week programme14. Adding a modified cross-body stretch gave better clinical and ultrasound results than no stretching14. All groups improved, including the one without stretching14.
A trial took 67 people with subacromial impingement syndrome31. Adding a modified cross-body or sleeper stretch did better than the programme alone for pain with activity and inward rotation31.
In a trial of 16 patients with subacromial pain, holding the shoulder blade raised horizontal adduction by 40 degrees, against 8 without8. Every patient also had electrical stimulation before stretching and a cold pack after, so the stretches were not tested alone8. Recruitment stopped at 16 patients, short of the planned 12 per group8. The authors concluded the stretching had limited effect on pain8.
In 35 overhead athletes with shoulder pain and a rotation loss, pain fell by 2.17 with the sleeper stretch and 1.54 with cross-body16. The groups did not differ significantly16.
Progressive overload
The authors of a 2024 scoping review found no agreed protocol for how often, how hard or how long to do these stretches30. Trials of the cross-body stretch have used these doses:
| Trial group | Holds | How often and how long |
|---|---|---|
| 39 college-age people | 5 of 30 seconds, to mild discomfort | At least once a day, 4 weeks9 |
| 87 healthy people | 6 of 30 seconds, seated | One session10 |
| 24 adolescent baseball players | 3 of 30 seconds, to gentle tension | Once a day, 3 weeks15 |
| Male tennis players | 3 to 5 of 30 seconds, side-lying | Once a day, 4 weeks11 |
| People with subacromial impingement | 5 of 30 seconds, side-lying | Every day, 4 weeks31 |
| Patients with shoulder pain | 10 of 5 seconds, to tightness but not pain | Three sessions8 |
| 26 people with limited range | Self-stretching, with or without a belt | 4 times a week, 4 weeks4 |
| Patients with subacromial pain | 5 assisted holds of 15 seconds | 15 supervised sessions over 4 weeks14 |
In the 15-session trial, each assisted hold moved to a new end of range14. In the adolescent trial, a guardian supervised and signed off each session in a daily log, which showed full reported adherence15.
What lasts after stopping
In the 39-person trial, inward rotation was still above baseline 4 weeks after the programme ended9. Total rotation had fallen from its end-of-programme value, and the group that also had joint mobilisation kept more of its gain9. Mobilisation is gentle movement of a joint, often done by hand by another person. The 16-patient trial’s authors stated it had no long-term follow-up8. A 2026 review in throwing athletes called for larger studies with long-term follow-up7.
Connections
The stretch works on the back of the shoulder joint, where it lowered lower capsule stiffness in 15 healthy men18. It stretched the back of the deltoid in 15 healthy men1. Stiffness changes have been measured in the infraspinatus and teres minor22,23. The rotator cuff tendons fuse with the capsule26.
Some trials enrolled people with subacromial impingement syndrome31. Several trials compared it with the sleeper stretch11,29. A meta-analysis of static stretching programmes in adults linked range gains to lower stiffness and higher stretch tolerance32.
Cross-body stretch stretches the back of
Cross-body stretch stretches the back part of
Cross-body stretch is studied for stiffness in the
Cross-body stretch is studied for its effect on the capsule joined by the
Cross-body stretch has been studied in people with
Cross-body stretch is compared in trials with the
Cross-body stretch is a kind of
Sources
- Mukai H, Umehara J, Yagi M, Yanase K, Itsuda H, Ichihashi N (2022). Effective stretching position for the posterior deltoid muscle evaluated by shear wave elastography.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.143 PMID 35245666
- Iida N, Velasquez Garcia A, Kuroiwa T, Hsu KL, Selim OA (2026). Role of stretching interventions in enhancing the shoulder range of motion in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. doi:10.1002/pmrj.13453 PMID 40843660
- Salamh PA, Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ (2015). Effect of scapular stabilization during horizontal adduction stretching on passive internal rotation and posterior shoulder tightness in young women volleyball athletes: a randomized controlled trial.. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.038 PMID 25450120
- Joung HN, Yi CH, Jeon HS, Hwang UJ, Kwon OY (2019). Effects of 4-week self-cross body stretching with scapular stabilization on shoulder motions and horizontal adductor strength in subjects with limited shoulder horizontal adduction: cross body stretching with stabilization.. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. doi:10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08454-2 PMID 29845835
- Salamh PA, Liu X, Hanney WJ, Sprague PA, Kolber MJ (2019). The efficacy and fidelity of clinical interventions used to reduce posterior shoulder tightness: a systematic review with meta-analysis.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.12.006 PMID 30902594
- Mine K, Nakayama T, Milanese S, Grimmer K (2017). Effectiveness of Stretching on Posterior Shoulder Tightness and Glenohumeral Internal-Rotation Deficit: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Journal of sport rehabilitation. doi:10.1123/jsr.2015-0172 PMID 27632891
- Brockhouse C, McCulloch PC, Harris JD, Hedt C (2026). Scraping the surface: A systematic review of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization vs passive stretching for throwers' shoulders.. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2026.03.024 PMID 42264851
- Howell AJ, Burchett A, Heebner N, Walker C, Baunach A, Seidt A, Uhl TL (2022). Effectiveness of Scapular Stabilization Versus Non-Stabilization Stretching on Shoulder Range of Motion, a Randomized Clinical Trial.. International journal of sports physical therapy. doi:10.26603/001c.34439 PMID 35693853
- Manske RC, Meschke M, Porter A, Smith B, Reiman M (2010). A randomized controlled single-blinded comparison of stretching versus stretching and joint mobilization for posterior shoulder tightness measured by internal rotation motion loss.. Sports health. doi:10.1177/1941738109347775 PMID 23015927
- Park KN, Kwon OY, Weon JH, Choung SD, Kim SH (2014). Comparison of the effects of local cryotherapy and passive cross-body stretch on extensibility in subjects with posterior shoulder tightness.. Journal of sports science & medicine. PMID 24570610
- D A, Sudhan M A, Chandran S, Nuhmani S, Ahsan M, Alghadir AH, et al. (2023). Effects of modified sleeper stretch and modified cross-body stretch on upper limb functions and shoulder ROM in tennis players: a randomized trial.. Scientific reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35977-w PMID 37277413
- Tawfik A, Toci GR, Sirch F, Gibbs B, Conte E, Fletcher D, et al. (2022). The Effects of Sleeper and Superman Stretches on Time-Zero Shoulder Range of Motion in Collegiate Athletes.. Cureus. doi:10.7759/cureus.22600 PMID 35371739
- Wilk KE, Hooks TR, Macrina LC (2013). The modified sleeper stretch and modified cross-body stretch to increase shoulder internal rotation range of motion in the overhead throwing athlete.. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.4990 PMID 24175603
- Türksan HE, Yeşilyaprak SS, Erduran M, Özcan C (2024). Novel Posterior Shoulder Stretching With Rapid Eccentric Contraction and Static Stretching in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Trial.. Sports health. doi:10.1177/19417381231181127 PMID 37377154
- Kawakami J, Karasuyama M, Tomohiko N, Takaki I, Ryota E, Mika K, et al. (2025). Cross-Body Versus Combined Sleeper Stretch for Posterior Shoulder Tightness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Cureus. doi:10.7759/cureus.92975 PMID 41141136
- de Araújo JN, Oliveira ABA, de Araújo DLF, Dos Santos GA, da Silva MR, Kamonseki DH, et al. (2026). The effects of sleeper stretch vs. crossbody stretch in overhead athletes with shoulder pain and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit: a randomized controlled trial.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2025.12.017 PMID 41580269
- Bailey LB, Shanley E, Hawkins R, Beattie PF, Fritz S, Kwartowitz D, et al. (2015). Mechanisms of Shoulder Range of Motion Deficits in Asymptomatic Baseball Players.. The American journal of sports medicine. doi:10.1177/0363546515602446 PMID 26403207
- Yagi M, Umehara J, Noda T, Mukai H, Ichihashi N (2025). Effects of sleeper and cross-body stretching on posterior shoulder capsule stiffness.. Journal of biomechanics. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112922 PMID 40850150
- Stokey PJ, Kaur S, Lee A, Behrens K, Ebraheim N (2024). Anatomy and Deficiency of the Deltoid Muscle: A Review of Literature.. Orthopedic Reviews. doi:10.52965/001c.115352 PMID 38562147
- Muraki T, Aoki M, Uchiyama E, Murakami G, Miyamoto S (2006). The effect of arm position on stretching of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and posterior portion of deltoid muscles: a cadaveric study.. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.014 PMID 16481080
- Gray H; Lewis WH (editor) (1918). Anatomy of the Human Body. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia (20th edition). Link
- Umehara J, Hasegawa S, Nakamura M, Nishishita S, Umegaki H, Tanaka H, et al. (2017). Effect of scapular stabilization during cross-body stretch on the hardness of infraspinatus, teres minor, and deltoid muscles: An ultrasonic shear wave elastography study.. Musculoskeletal science & practice. doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.10.004 PMID 27847244
- Yamauchi T, Hasegawa S, Nakamura M, Nishishita S, Yanase K, Fujita K, et al. (2016). Effects of two stretching methods on shoulder range of motion and muscle stiffness in baseball players with posterior shoulder tightness: a randomized controlled trial.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.04.025 PMID 27475455
- Bicici Ulusahin S, Duzgun I, Ugurlu M, Ozcakar L (2024). Effects of the stretching program in male volleyball players with posterior shoulder tightness.. Musculoskeletal science & practice. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103148 PMID 39047592
- Fukaya T, Morishita K, Yokoi Y, Takeuchi K, Nakamura M (2024). Acute and chronic effects of static stretching of different target muscles on shear elastic modulus: A narrative review.. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102939 PMID 39454517
- Betts JG, Young KA, Wise JA, Johnson E, Poe B, Kruse DH, Korol O, Johnson JE, Womble M, DeSaix P (2022). Anatomy and Physiology 2e. OpenStax. Link
- Laudner KG, Stanek JM, Meister K (2006). Assessing posterior shoulder contracture: the reliability and validity of measuring glenohumeral joint horizontal adduction.. Journal of athletic training. PMID 17273461
- Salamh PA, Liu X, Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ, Hegedus EJ (2019). The reliability, validity, and methodologic quality of measurements used to quantify posterior shoulder tightness: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.013 PMID 30287146
- McClure P, Balaicuis J, Heiland D, Broersma ME, Thorndike CK, Wood A (2007). A randomized controlled comparison of stretching procedures for posterior shoulder tightness.. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2337 PMID 17416125
- Fukushima Y, Avilineni M, Kao M, Tirmizey H, Faber KJ, Furtado R, et al. (2024). An evidence-informed rehabilitation management framework for posterior shoulder tightness: A scoping review.. Shoulder & elbow. doi:10.1177/17585732231193166 PMID 38425737
- Tahran Ö, Yeşilyaprak SS (2020). Effects of Modified Posterior Shoulder Stretching Exercises on Shoulder Mobility, Pain, and Dysfunction in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.. Sports health. doi:10.1177/1941738119900532 PMID 32017660
- Ingram LA, Tomkinson GR, d'Unienville NMA, Gower B, Gleadhill S, Boyle T, Bennett H (2025). Mechanisms Underlying Range of Motion Improvements Following Acute and Chronic Static Stretching: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Multivariate Meta-regression.. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). doi:10.1007/s40279-025-02204-7 PMID 40180774
Changes
- First published.