Your Basic Trainer

Library / Exercises

Side plank

Also called side bridge, side-bridge, side support

A held position that works the side of the trunk and the hip. What studies measured it loading, from the obliques and quadratus lumborum to the gluteal muscles, and what is known about training those muscles.

Region
Trunk
Muscles
quadratus lumborum, external oblique, internal oblique, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, gluteus maximus, rectus abdominis, erector spinae, multifidus, deltoid
Updated
October 23, 2026
Reviewed
October 23, 2026 · how entries are checked

Movement

What the movement is

A side-bridge is a side plank: the body is held straight while propped on one forearm and the side of the feet. One study measured it as an isometric hold on one elbow and both feet6. Another compared the weightbearing side, the side that bears the weight, with the other side8.

The versions studies have used

The studies on this page tested the side plank in several forms, and each finding below names its version6,8,9:

  • Held on one elbow and both feet6.
  • The torso-elevated side support, with the upper body raised, and the foot-elevated side support, with the feet raised7,8.
  • The rotational side-bridge, one of four side-bridge exercises one study compared8. It is a side plank that turns from facing the side to facing down.
  • A side plank with hip abduction, including one with the dominant leg on the bottom1.
  • A body-weight side plank10.
  • A wall side bridge and two side-lying variations, each compared with the traditional side bridge9.

What ended the hold

One study asked 17 healthy people to hold a torso-elevated side support to failure7. Of them, 41.1% stopped because of shoulder fatigue, and 17.0% stopped because of shoulder pain7.

What it loads

The side of the trunk

On the flanks, the abdominal wall has three layers of muscle2. The external oblique is the outer layer, the internal oblique the middle one, and the transversus abdominis the deepest2. The two obliques are prime movers (main muscles) for twisting at the waist and for lateral flexion (bending the spine to the side)2.

During a side support on one elbow and both feet, the quadratus lumborum was more active than other muscles in four young adults6. In a study of eight people, the side bridge was the best of the isometric abdominal exercises tested by one measure5. That measure was working the abdominal wall while keeping psoas activity low5.

A systematic review searches the research on a question in a set, checkable way. One such review covered core-muscle EMG in healthy adults4. It reports that one study found side-plank activity of about 35% of maximum in the external oblique and about 26% in the internal oblique4. It reports that one study found the greatest external oblique activity of the exercises it tested in side planks4.

Maximum expiration means breathing out as hard as possible. The review reports that one study found it significantly raised rectus abdominis and oblique activation during side planks4.

Single studies measured the external oblique in particular versions7,8:

  • In 17 healthy people, the torso-elevated side support gave external oblique activity of about 78% of maximum7.
  • In 25 people, the rotational side-bridge gave external oblique activity of 62.8% of maximum8.
  • In 30 healthy people, the authors concluded the side-bridge could be used to strengthen the external oblique12.

How the version changes the work

In 20 healthy men, a wall side bridge gave significantly less quadratus lumborum activity than the traditional side bridge9. The same study found two side-lying variations gave external oblique, internal oblique and quadratus lumborum activity similar to the traditional side bridge9.

In 25 people, four side-bridge exercises were compared8. The rotational side-bridge gave the most activation in three of the four trunk muscles recorded8. In that study, most measured trunk and thigh muscles were more active on the weightbearing side than on the other side8. The exceptions were the rectus abdominis, at the front of the abdomen, in the rotational side-bridge, and the longissimus thoracis in the torso-elevated side support2,8. The longissimus thoracis is one of two lower-back muscles of the erector spinae, the long muscles beside the spine that straighten the back8,13.

The hip muscles

The gluteal muscles are the three muscles of the buttock. The gluteus medius lies beneath the gluteus maximus2. The gluteus minimus lies beneath the gluteus medius2. The gluteus maximus is aligned to extend the hip (move the thigh backward) and turn it outward14. It also helps with hip abduction14.

Several studies found high gluteus medius activity in side planks1,8:

  • In 30 healthy people, the authors concluded the side-bridge could be used to strengthen the gluteus medius12.
  • In 25 people, gluteus medius activity was above 69% of maximum in the torso-elevated side support, the foot-elevated side support and the rotational side-bridge8.
  • In 24 healthy people, the side plank with hip abduction gave the highest gluteus medius activity of 18 exercises1.
  • A second systematic review covered 23 EMG studies of people without injury3. It placed the side bridge with hip abduction among the top three exercises for gluteus medius activity3.

In the 24-person study, gluteus medius activity reached 103% of maximum with the dominant leg on the bottom1. Gluteus maximus activity in the same exercise was above 70% of maximum1. In the review, the three top exercises ranged from 81 to 103% of maximum3.

A modelling study of 14 female footballers estimated gluteal muscle forces10. The body-weight side plank was a top-tier exercise for gluteus medius and gluteus minimus force10. The study gave force in newtons as a 95% confidence interval10. A newton is a unit of force, and a confidence interval is a range around a study’s result that shows how precise it is:

Muscle95% confidence interval for force, body-weight side plank
Gluteus medius338 to 483 newtons10
Gluteus minimus272 to 382 newtons10

The back and front of the trunk

The erector spinae, the group of long muscles beside the spine that straighten the back, is the main extensor of the spine2. In the lower back, one of its two muscles is the longissimus thoracis13. There, the multifidus, a deep muscle running along the spine, lies nearer the midline than the erector spinae and belongs to a different group15.

In adults aged 21 to 35, the side-bridge gave longissimus thoracis and lumbar (lower back) multifidus activity below 50% of maximum11. In the 25-person study, the rotational side-bridge gave longissimus thoracis activity of 41.3% of maximum8. The core-muscle review reports that one study found side-plank erector spinae activity of about 20% of maximum4.

It also reports that one study ranked the side plank and a suspended side plank highest for erector spinae activation of its exercises4. That is a ranking between exercises. Each erector spinae level above is below half of maximum4,8,11.

The rectus abdominis is the prime mover for bending the spine forward2. In the rotational side-bridge, its activity was 43.9% of maximum8. The core-muscle review reports that one study found about 15% in the side plank4. It reports that one study found about 75% in the side plank with maximum expiration4.

The shoulder

The deltoid, the rounded muscle that caps the shoulder, has three parts: front, middle and back16. The middle part raises the arm out to the side17. In 17 healthy people, the torso-elevated side support gave middle deltoid activity of about 56% of maximum7. That was more than in the foot-elevated side support7.

The low back

One study measured a twisting moment, the turning effect of a force, at the low back18. In eight healthy men holding a closed-chain side bridge, the average was 22 ± 14 newton-metres, directed to the right18. A newton-metre is a unit of turning effect. Closed-chain means done with the hands or feet fixed against the floor, so they do not move freely.

How the body adapts

The side-plank studies on this page measured muscle activity, force or load during the hold6,10,18. The studies below looked at training muscles the side plank works; they are not studies of the side plank itself1,7,11,19,20,21.

  • External oblique. A randomised controlled trial assigns people to groups by chance, then compares the groups. One such trial had 73 people aged 18 to 45, and 40 did four weeks of rotational movement exercise19. Their external oblique thickness on ultrasound, a scan made with sound waves, rose significantly from their first measurement19. The abstract gives no comparison with the untrained group19.
  • Gluteus maximus. A meta-analysis pools the results of earlier studies. One pooled resistance-training studies of at least five weeks in healthy adults aged 18 to 45, and found a moderate effect on its growth20.
  • Erector spinae. In a two-year trial in healthy white postmenopausal women, 27 did progressive back-strengthening exercise21. Their mean back extensor strength rose from 39.4 kg to 66.8 kg, against 36.9 kg to 49.0 kg in 23 controls21.

Progressive overload

A 2026 position stand describes progressive overload as the need to increase the stimulus placed on the muscle throughout a training programme22. The trials below progressed the side bridge by hold time, tempo, sets or harder variations, each inside a programme of several exercises23,24,25.

Longer holds and a set tempo

In a randomised trial of adolescent male sub-elite handball players, the training group did three sets of the side bridge on both sides23. They trained three times a week, and holds rose from 45 seconds to 60 and then 75, every two weeks over six weeks23. Odd weeks were static holds, and even weeks kept a beat of 60 per minute23. This side bridge was done from bent knees, and in the beat weeks the hips were raised and lowered continuously23.

The programme, in 26 players, also had cross curl-ups and the bird dog23. It improved back and side trunk endurance scores more than handball training alone, but throwing speed showed no change specific to the group23.

Adding sets

In a study of 32 elite soccer players, the side plank was one of six bodyweight exercises, done four times a week for 8 weeks24. Each was done in 5 sets of 10 repetitions, one side at a time, adding one set in each following week24.

Harder variations

A study of 10 healthy, physically active people used seven side bridge variations in order26. They ran from a short bridge to a long bridge, then one-leg support26. Next came two legs, then one, on a hemisphere ball, a half-ball balance trainer26. Last came two legs, then one, on a fit ball, a large exercise ball26.

In 57 healthy, young, physically active male students, long bridging gave higher pelvic accelerations than short bridging in front, back and side bridges27. Pelvic acceleration was recorded with a smartphone accelerometer, a sensor that records movement27. In 76 males and females doing front, back and side bridges, one leg generally gave more body sway than two28. A hemisphere ball gave more than the floor28.

A trial that moved people up the variations

A randomised trial in physically active males set the side bridge from the same seven variations25. Its two training groups did four repetitions each of the right and left side bridge, twice a week for 6 weeks25. The front bridge, back bridge and bird-dog were in the same sessions25. The higher-intensity group held each repetition 15 seconds on a harder variation, and the higher-volume group 30 seconds on an easier one25.

In the fourth and eighth sessions, each person tried the next-harder variation25. The one in their group’s pelvic-acceleration range became their new exercise25. The higher-volume group improved within the group on all trunk endurance tests, the dominant side bridge test among them25. But neither training group differed from the other or from the control group25.

Connections

The muscles it works

Each of these has its own page, and each was measured in a side-plank study1,7,8,11:

Muscles without a page yet

Side-plank studies also measured the quadratus lumborum, the internal oblique, the gluteus medius and minimus, and the multifidus6,9,10,11.

Sources

  1. Boren K, Conrey C, Le Coguic J, Paprocki L, Voight M, Robinson TK (2011). Electromyographic analysis of gluteus medius and gluteus maximus during rehabilitation exercises.. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. PMID 22034614
  2. Betts JG, Young KA, Wise JA, Johnson E, Poe B, Kruse DH, Korol O, Johnson JE, Womble M, DeSaix P (2022). Anatomy and Physiology 2e. OpenStax. Link
  3. Macadam P, Cronin J, Contreras B (2015). AN EXAMINATION OF THE GLUTEAL MUSCLE ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAMIC HIP ABDUCTION AND HIP EXTERNAL ROTATION EXERCISE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. PMID 26491608
  4. Oliva-Lozano JM, Muyor JM (2020). Core Muscle Activity During Physical Fitness Exercises: A Systematic Review.. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph17124306 PMID 32560185
  5. Juker D, McGill S, Kropf P, Steffen T (1998). Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of lumbar portions of psoas and the abdominal wall during a wide variety of tasks.. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. doi:10.1097/00005768-199802000-00020 PMID 9502361
  6. McGill S, Juker D, Kropf P (1996). Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of quadratus lumborum during a wide variety of tasks.. Clinical Biomechanics. doi:10.1016/0268-0033(95)00056-9 PMID 11415616
  7. Devorski L, Bazett-Jones DM, Mangum LC, Glaviano NR (2022). Muscle Activation in the Shoulder Girdle and Lumbopelvic-Hip Complex During Common Therapeutic Exercises.. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. doi:10.1123/jsr.2020-0485 PMID 34525451
  8. Youdas JW, Boor MM, Darfler AL, Koenig MK, Mills KM, Hollman JH (2014). Surface electromyographic analysis of core trunk and hip muscles during selected rehabilitation exercises in the side-bridge to neutral spine position.. Sports Health. doi:10.1177/1941738114539266 PMID 25177418
  9. Choi CW, Koo JW, Jeong YG (2020). Comparison of Trunk Muscle Activity During Modified Side-Bridge Exercises and Traditional Side Bridge Exercise.. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. doi:10.1123/jsr.2019-0052 PMID 31816597
  10. Collings TJ, Bourne MN, Barrett RS, Meinders E, Gonçalves BAM, Shield AJ, Diamond LE (2023). Gluteal Muscle Forces during Hip-Focused Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation Exercises.. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003091 PMID 36918403
  11. Ekstrom RA, Osborn RW, Hauer PL (2008). Surface electromyographic analysis of the low back muscles during rehabilitation exercises.. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2865 PMID 19195137
  12. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC (2007). Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises.. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2471 PMID 18560185
  13. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N (1987). 1987 Volvo award in basic science. The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae.. Spine. doi:10.1097/00007632-198709000-00004 PMID 3686217
  14. Pourahmadi M, Asadi M, Dommerholt J, Yeganeh A (2020). Changes in the macroscopic morphology of hip muscles in low back pain.. Journal of Anatomy. doi:10.1111/joa.13086 PMID 31475359
  15. Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R (2012). The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations.. Journal of Anatomy. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x PMID 22630613
  16. Vohra A, Paul B, Saunders P, Galal Y, Yao S, Hui C, Lederman E, McKee M, Shah A (2024). Anatomic variations of the deltoid muscle insertion: a cadaveric study.. JSES International. doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.013 PMID 38707574
  17. Stokey PJ, Kaur S, Lee A, Behrens K, Ebraheim N (2024). Anatomy and Deficiency of the Deltoid Muscle: A Review of Literature.. Orthopedic Reviews. doi:10.52965/001c.115352 PMID 38562147
  18. Tuff T, Beach TAC, Howarth SJ (2020). BIOMECHANICAL MATCHING OF LOW BACK EXTERNAL DEMANDS DURING THE OPEN- AND CLOSED-CHAIN SIDE BRIDGE.. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. PMID 32089958
  19. Niewiadomy P, Szuścik-Niewiadomy K, Kuszewski M, Kurpas A, Kochan M (2021). The influence of rotational movement exercise on the abdominal muscle thickness and trunk mobility - Randomized control trial.. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.05.008 PMID 34391272
  20. Krause Neto W, Krause TLV, Gama EF (2025). The impact of resistance training on gluteus maximus hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Frontiers in Physiology. doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1542334 PMID 40276368
  21. Sinaki M, Itoi E, Wahner HW, Wollan P, Gelzcer R, Mullan BP, Collins DA, Hodgson SF (2002). Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women.. Bone. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00739-1 PMID 12052450
  22. Currier BS, D'Souza AC, Singh MAF, Lowisz CV, Rawson ES, Schoenfeld BJ, Smith-Ryan AE, et al (2026). American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Resistance Training Prescription for Muscle Function, Hypertrophy, and Physical Performance in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Reviews.. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003897 PMID 41843416
  23. Bauer J, Muehlbauer T (2022). Effects of a 6 week core strengthening training on measures of physical and athletic performance in adolescent male sub-elite handball players.. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.1037078 PMID 36419671
  24. Gołaś A, Pietraszewski P, Roczniok R, Terbalyan A, Maszczyk A, Opaliński R, Zając A (2024). Effects of an 8-week pre-season targeted training on sprinting performance, agility and lower limb muscular asymmetries in elite soccer players.. Biology of Sport. doi:10.5114/biolsport.2024.134754 PMID 39416490
  25. Prat-Luri A, Vera-Garcia FJ, Moreno-Navarro P, Juan-Recio C, de Los Ríos-Calonge J, Heredia-Elvar JR, Elvira JLL, Barbado D (2025). Short-term bridging and bird-dog exercise programs did not enhance trunk performance and whole-body dynamic balance in young physically active males: A double-blind randomized trial.. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325040 PMID 40471900
  26. Heredia-Elvar JR, Juan-Recio C, Prat-Luri A, Barbado D, Vera-Garcia FJ (2021). Observational Screening Guidelines and Smartphone Accelerometer Thresholds to Establish the Intensity of Some of the Most Popular Core Stability Exercises.. Frontiers in Physiology. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.751569 PMID 34744790
  27. Heredia-Elvar JR, Juan-Recio C, Prat-Luri A, Barbado D, de Los Ríos-Calonge J, Vera-Garcia FJ (2024). Exercise Intensity Progressions and Criteria to Prescribe Core Stability Exercises in Young Physically Active Men: A Smartphone Accelerometer-Based Study.. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004630 PMID 38088901
  28. Vera-Garcia FJ, Irles-Vidal B, Prat-Luri A, García-Vaquero MP, Barbado D, Juan-Recio C (2020). Progressions of core stabilization exercises based on postural control challenge assessment.. European Journal of Applied Physiology. doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04313-9 PMID 32048007

Every source the library cites

Changes

  • Added a Progressive overload section.
  • Tidy pass: minor review findings fixed, glosses aligned with the reviewed glossary.
  • Added a figure showing where it sits, links to the exercise pages that load it, and tighter wording in a few places.